Are all your "questions" from 1982, asked and answered thousands of times but you simply don't bother to look them up?

The first question is too dumb to bother with. Is your demand that every single temperature driver be defined before you think that climate change happens? I guess every model of every system ever used is useless. Yes, this one you absolutely can wave away in the same way . In fact, this seems to be the gist of your entire "effort". Answers to your questions a few finger clicks away... I'll waste time for three

What caused little ice age?

https://www.umass.edu/news/article/winter-coming-researchers-uncover-surprising-cause-little-ice-age

What caused Holocene stability?

https://phys.org/news/2021-01-holocene-temperature-affirms-role-greenhouse.html

"What about the poles? "

This entire article is a mess. You reference ONE article to claim "Antarctic is not warming"

I think you don't know how to read scientific articles. The conclusions in the abstact that YOU linked to:

"With Antarctic Peninsula loss of −26 Gt a−1, the Antarctic total gain is 95 ± 25 Gt a−1 during 2003–08, compared to 144 ± 61 Gt a−1 from ERS1/2 during 1992–2001. Beginning in 2009, large increases in coastal WA dynamic losses overcame long-term EA and inland WA gains bringing Antarctica close to balance at −12 ± 64 Gt a−1 by 2012–16."

This clearly says that over the 24 year period studied, recent losses (2009-2016) overcame earlier expansion.

Antarctic ice absolutely retreating:

https://phys.org/news/2023-09-stability-west-antarctica-marine-ice.html

https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/31158

Yeah, no reason to waste any more time with the other 17 "questions"