I did. Its the exact same stuff I have been talking about. Sorry for the long response. I hope you read it.

"We demand an immediate worldwide emergency program, led by climate scientists, to end fossil fuels, end climate abuse and repair our planet."

Who, specifically, are you making this demand to? Why would they listen to you? Because you interrupted a play? Because you glued your hands to the street and stopped traffic? Because you have a sign?

You should read this book:

https://www.amazon.com/When-Science-Goes-Wrong-Discovery/dp/0452289327

Read about this historical event:

https://www.history.com/news/the-infamous-40-year-tuskegee-study

and this one:

https://www.history.com/news/birth-control-pill-history-puerto-rico-enovid

and this:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5072843/

theranos was run by a self styled scientist who was out to "save the world".

Here are some scientists you should go look up.

Shiro Ishii

Philip Zimbardo

Andrew Wakefield

Dr. John Cutler

Dr. Aubrey Levin

Wendell Johnson

John B. Watson and Rosalie Rayner

Chester M. Southam

Dr. Alvin C. Graves

Sydney Gottlieb

Thomas Midgley Jr

Trofim Lysenko

Will they be on your board? Why not? Who vets these scientists?

I could go forever.

it happens over and over and over again

Even when I did my PhD and we were literally streching goat spines after permission from the review board, my lead expanded the study outside the bounds that were permissioned..

Never mind that there are TONS of scientists who are NOT on your side at all, because being a scientist doesnt necessarily mean you believe in AGW. You think you will avoid them in your Technocratic Board of Scientists with ultimate power? Who chooses who is in and who is not. The people who glued their hands to the street?

By reading these things, and if , like me, you have worked with many scientists, you will see that using scientists to lead by force and coercion leads to inhumane and morally corrupt results, because they are there to solve a problem in a silo. People's sovereignty and agency are irrelevant to them. These are the same characteristics the worst dictators in history have had.

We can 100% solve murder... we just need to sedate everyone. If those are the type of solutions you are looking for, then yeah, put scientists in charge.

The thing you should have learned from all this is that if a system is in place that grants powers to some people and not others, they will absolutely use that power for themselves. This is a simple fact of governments and has been the reason democracy is a failed methodology for leading large groups of people. It has had 2500 years of trial and failure.

"We will be an unrelenting and unavoidable nuisance to the people and systems"

You are just going to get kicked in the face or shot. This method is the absolute worst. You want people to hate you? You want people to continue rejecting global warming due to the "Green agenda", then this is the way. You go.

Alternatively, you could be working towards not funding government. Then you don't even have to glue your hands to the road. Use alternate systems, so that in the end, businesses actually have to sell product you want, rather than what governments want and want you to have. You can keep more of your money, and create new systems that obviate people's tendency to rely on the war machines and polluters that you wish to fight.

It is not I who is not hearing you. It's quite the reverse.